[1]王军会,杨秦丹.胶合板产品生命周期(LCA)评价分析[J].陕西林业科技,2019,(05):72-75.
 WANG Jun-hui,YANG Qin-dan.Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment for Plywood[J].,2019,(05):72-75.
点击复制

胶合板产品生命周期(LCA)评价分析()
分享到:

《陕西林业科技》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
72-75
栏目:
试验与调查研究
出版日期:
2019-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment for Plywood
文章编号:
1001-2117(2019)05-0072-04
作者:
王军会1杨秦丹2
1.陕西省林产品开发贸易总公司,西安 710003; 2.陕西省楼观台国有生态实验林场,陕西 周至 710400
Author(s):
WANG Jun-hui1 YANG Qin-dan2
1.Shaanxi General Company of Forest Production Development and Trade, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710003; 2.Louguantai State-owned Ecological Experimental Farm of Shaanxi, Zhouzhi, Shaanxi 710400
关键词:
胶合板 生命周期评价 全球温室变暖潜力 碳足迹
Keywords:
Plywood life cycle assessment global warming potential carbon footprint
分类号:
TS653
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生命周期评价已经成为ISO14000系列标准中产品绿色评价的核心和确定环境标志及产品环境标准的基础,同时也是环境标志计划与清洁生产的重要依据。人造板生命周期评价是完成以“碳标签”为特征的碳足迹信息认证的国际公认方法。研究运用生命循环周期评价法进行胶合板产品生命周期过程中的全球变暖潜力指标,分析并辨识影响产品表现的关键阶段,指导胶合板产品改进生产工艺,进行绿色制造的途径和方法。结果显示,整个胶合板材生产中,贴面用天然木质装饰单板原材料消耗造成的环境影响较大,其中资源耗竭潜力、酸化效应、初级能源消耗、富营养化潜值、全球温室变暖潜力和可吸入无机物,其贡献率分别为86.53%、77.63%、98.76%、78.23%、76.41%和82.85%。生产过程柴油使用相对较少。
Abstract:
Life cycle assessment(LCA)has become the core of the ISO14000 series standard in the product evaluation criteria and the basis of environment mark and product environmental standards, as well as environment mark planning and important basis on the implementation of cleaner production.The life cycle evaluation of artificial board is an internationally recognized method to complete the carbon footprint information certification with the characteristics of "carbon tag".Study on the global warming potential index of the life cycle of plywood products using the life cycle assessment method, analyzed and identified key stages for affecting product performance, guide plywood products to improve production process and make green manufacturing methods.The research shows that in the whole production of plywood materials, the environmental impact caused by the consumption of natural woodiness adornment veneer is large.Of their resource depletion potential, acidification effect, the primary energy consumption, global greenhouse warming potential and inhaled inorganic matter, the contribution rates were 86.528%, 77.633%, 98.757%, 78.226%, 76.414% and 82.848%, respectively.The production process consumes less diesel relatively.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈水合.2016年我国木材消费量和资源分析[J].中国林业产,2017(5):34-35.
[2] 服部顺昭.木材/木质材料的生命周期评价[J].木材情报[日],2006(6):24-25.
[3] Hauschild M, Wenzel H.Environment al Assessment of Products.Volume 2: Scienific Background [M ].London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall, 1998.
[4] 王君,李朝晖.中密度纤维板项目环境影响评价若干问题探讨[J].环境科学与管理, 2008, 33(7):191-194.
[5] 左铁镛,冯之浚.循环型社会材料循环与环境影响评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[6] 王爱华.竹/木质产品生命周期评价及其应用研究[ D].北京:中国林业科学院,2007.
[7] 谢立生.木材工业生命周期评价研究现状[J].木材工业,2010,24(5):28-31.
[8] 聂祚仁,高峰,陈文娟,等.材料生命周期的评价研究[J].材料导报,2015,23(13):1-6.
[9] GB/T 24025-2009,环境标志和声明III型环境声明原则和程序[S].
[10] GB/T 24040-2008,环境管理生命周期评价原则与框架[S].
[11] GB/T 24044-2008,环境管理生命周期评价要求与指南[S].
[12] 杨建新,徐成,王如松.产品生命周期评价方法及应用[M].北京:气象出版社, 2002.
[13] Milota MR, West CD, Hartley ID.Gate-to-gate life-cycle inventory of soft wood lumber production[J].Wood and Fiber Science, 2005( 37 Corrim Special Issue): 47-57.
[14] 向仕龙,魏新莉,刘文金.从生命周期角度评价刨花板的环境特性[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2007,27(6): 166-168.
[15] 李晓平,周定国,于艳春.利用生命周期评价法评价农作物秸秆人造板的环境特性[J].浙江林学院学报,2010,27(2): 210-216.
[16] 张方文,于文吉.生命周期评价体系在人造板工业的应用及研究进展[J].林产工业, 2015,42(11): 18-21.
[17] Liangliang Jia,chu jie,Xuemin Qi.Life Cycle Assessment of Plywood manufacturing,Process in China[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019(6):2037-2047.
[18] 刘夏璐,王洪涛,陈建等.中国生命周期参考数据库的建立方法与基础模型[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(10):2136-2144.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-08-25
作者简介:王军会(1971-),女,工程师,主要从事森林资源调查、管护与利用工作。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-25