[1]张亚坚,刘宗君,谢 勇.南岭国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估[J].陕西林业科技,2017,(05):32-37.
 ZHANG Ya-jian,LIU Zong-jun,XIE Yong.Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services of Nanling National Nature Reserve[J].,2017,(05):32-37.
点击复制

南岭国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估()
分享到:

《陕西林业科技》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
32-37
栏目:
试验与调查研究
出版日期:
2017-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services of Nanling National Nature Reserve
文章编号:
1001-2117(2017)05-0032-06
作者:
张亚坚刘宗君谢 勇
广东南岭国家级自然保护区管理局,广东 韶关 512727
Author(s):
ZHANG Ya-jian LIU Zong-jun XIE Yong
Nanling National Nature Reserve Administration, Shaoguan, Guangdong 512727
关键词:
南岭国家级自然保护区 森林生态系统 服务价值 评估
Keywords:
Forest ecosystem service value assessment Nanling Nature Reserve
分类号:
S718.55
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
森林生态系统具有重要的生态功能,评价森林生态系统服务功能的价值已成为当前生态学与生态经济学研究的前沿课题。本研究根据森林生态系统服务价值的计算方法,估算了南岭国家级自然保护区森林生态系统7项服务价值总量为70 348万元/年。在森林生态系统各项服务功能价值的贡献之中,其大小顺序依次为:固碳释氧>保育土壤>净化大气环境>生物多样性保护>涵养水源>积累营养物质>森林游憩。固碳释氧价值以20 846万元/年居第1位,占总价值的29.63%; 其次为保育土壤的价值,占总价值的24.67%,第三为净化大气环境,占总价值的22.55%,第四为生物多样性保护,占总价值的14.51%,这四项合计占到91.36%,而涵养水源、积累营养物质和森林游憩这三项只占很小比例。
Abstract:
The forest ecological system fulfills many important ecological functions. Researches on the analysis and valuation on forest ecosystem services are at the cutting edge of current ecology and ecological economics. Based on the calculation method of forest ecosystem service value, 7 forest ecosystem services of Nanling National Nature Reserve were evaluated, totaling 703.48 million yuan/year. In terms of the contribution size of the service value of forest ecosystem, carbon fixation and oxygen release came as the greatest one, followed by conservation of soil, purification of the air, biodiversity conservation, conservation of water, accumulation of nutrients, and forest recreation. With its value of 208.46 million yuan, carbon fixation and oxygen release ranked first, accounting for 29.63% of the total value, followed by conservation of soil 24.67% of total value, purification of the air 22.55% of the total value and biodiversity conservation 14.51%. Those 4 services made up 91.36% of the total value while the other 3 services ranging from conservation of water, accumulation of nutrients to forest recreation were merely a small proportion. This is because the Nanling National Nature Reserve is essentially a large oxygen bar. The above-mentioned ecosystem valuation method contributes to the understanding of the overall value of the forest ecosystem as well as the implementation and advancement in the regional sustainable development strategy.

参考文献/References:

[1] King R T. Wildlife and man[J]. Conservationist, 1966,20(6):8-11.
[2] Helliwell D R. Valuation of wildlife resources[J]. Regional Studier, 1969(3):41-49.
[3] Odum E P, Odum H T. Natural areas as necessary components of man's total environment[C]. In: Transsactions of the 37th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Wildlife Management Institute. Washington. D C, 1972(37):178-189.
[4] Costanza R D, Arge R, Rudolf de G, Farber S. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological, 1998,387:253-260.
[5] Serafy S E. Pricing the invaluable: the value of the worle's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. EcologicalEconomics, 1998,25(1):25-27.
[6] Heal G. Valuing ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Economic, 2000,35(3):24-30.
[7] Sagoff M. Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: A look beyond contingent valuation[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998,24(3):213-230.
[8] Wilson M A, Howarth R. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes thorough group deliberation[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002,41(3):431-443.
[9] Pearce D. Auditing the Earth[J]. Environment, 1998,40(2):23-25.
[10] Toman M. Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998,25(1):57-60.
[11] De Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem function, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002,41(3):393-408.
[12] Harold A. Mooney, Angela Cropper, Walter Reid. The millennium ecosystem assessment[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2004, 19(5):221-224.
[13] Serkan G. The estimation of ecosystem services' value in the region of Misi Rural Development Project: Results from a contingent valuation survey[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2006,9(3):209-218.
[14] Troy A., Wilson, M. A. Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GISand value transfer[J]. Ecological Economics, 2006,60(2):435-449.
[15] 王兵, 任晓旭, 胡文, 等. 森林生态系统服务功能评估区域差异性[J]. 东北林业大学学报[J], 2010,38(11):49-53.
[16] 赵金龙, 王泺鑫, 韩海荣, 等.森林生态系统服务功能价值评估研究进展与趋势[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013,32(8):2229-2237.
[17] Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387:253-260.
[18] 中国国家林业局.中国森林生态系统服务评估规范[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社. 2008.
[19] 张永利, 杨锋伟, 王兵等.中国森林生态系统服务功能研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2010.
[20] 华朝朗, 杨东, 赵元藩, 等. 云南省国家级和省级自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 植物分类与资源学报, 2013,35(5):646-664.
[21] 韩素芸, 田大伦, 闫文德, 等.湖南省主要森林类型生态系统服务功能价值评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学, 2009,29(6):6-12.
[22] 王兵, 鲁绍伟, 尤文忠, 等. 辽宁省森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(7):1792-1798.
[23] 牛香, 宋庆丰, 王兵,等.吉宁省森林生态系统服务功能[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2013, 41(8):36-41.
[24] 刘林馨.小兴安岭森林生态系统植物多样性及生态服务功能价值研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学,2012.
[25] 常艳. 内蒙古大兴安岭森林生态系统的服务功能及价值评估[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学,2010.
[26] 徐成立, 王雄宾, 余新晓, 等.北京山地森林生态服务功能评估[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(7):79-82.
[27] 修珍珍, 王斌, 杨校生, 等. 庙山坞自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(4):81-87.
[28] 王有奎, 郭生祥, 汪杰, 等. 甘肃祁连山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013,3(6):1905-1911.
[29] 刘林馨,刘传照, 毛子军. 丰林世界生物圈自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(3):38-42.
[30] 葛云.陇东子午岭林区森林涵养水源生态服务功能价值估算[J]. 陕西林业科技,2013(1):1-4.
[31] 雷 娜,韩霁昌,张卫华,等. 土地整理中农田防护林生态系统服务功能价值核算—以榆林市榆阳区孟家湾项目为例[J]. 陕西林业科技,2016(2):23-27.
[32] 广东林业规划勘查设计院.南岭自然保护区总体规划[M], 1999,(1999-2010),16.
[33] 陈林.广东省南岭国家级自然保护区植物物种多样性研究[D]. 广州:中国科学院华南植物园, 2011.
[34] 牛香, 王兵. 基于分布式测算方法的福建省森林生态系统服务功能评估[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(2):36-43.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-04-10
作者简介:张亚坚(1971-),男,大专,广东云浮人; 研究方向:自然保护区资源与环境管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-10-25